Minimal Weierstrass equation
magma: E := EllipticCurve("40a2");
sage: E = EllipticCurve("40a2")
gp: E = ellinit("40a2")
\( y^2 = x^{3} - 107 x - 426 \)
Mordell-Weil group structure
Torsion generators
\( \left(-6, 0\right) \)
Integral points
\( \left(-6, 0\right) \)
Invariants
|
magma: Conductor(E);
sage: E.conductor().factor()
gp: ellglobalred(E)[1]
|
|||||
| \( N \) | = | \( 40 \) | = | \(2^{3} \cdot 5\) | |
|
magma: Discriminant(E);
sage: E.discriminant().factor()
gp: E.disc
|
|||||
| \(\Delta\) | = | \(5120 \) | = | \(2^{10} \cdot 5 \) | |
|
magma: jInvariant(E);
sage: E.j_invariant().factor()
gp: E.j
|
|||||
| \(j \) | = | \( \frac{132304644}{5} \) | = | \(2^{2} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 5^{-1} \cdot 107^{3}\) | |
| \( \text{End} (E) \) | = | \(\Z\) | (no Complex Multiplication) | ||
| \( \text{ST} (E) \) | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
BSD invariants
|
magma: Rank(E);
sage: E.rank()
|
|||
| \( r \) | = | \(0\) | |
|
magma: Regulator(E);
sage: E.regulator()
|
|||
| \( \text{Reg} \) | = | \(1\) | |
|
magma: RealPeriod(E);
sage: E.period_lattice().omega()
gp: E.omega[1]
|
|||
| \( \Omega \) | ≈ | \(1.48441247342\) | |
|
magma: TamagawaNumbers(E);
sage: E.tamagawa_numbers()
gp: gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
|
|||
| \( \prod_p c_p \) | = | \( 2 \) = \( 2\cdot1 \) | |
|
magma: Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
sage: E.torsion_order()
gp: elltors(E)[1]
|
|||
| \( \#E_{\text{tor}} \) | = | \(2\) | |
|
magma: MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
sage: E.sha().an_numerical()
|
|||
| Ш\(_{\text{an}} \) | = | \(1\) (exact) | |
Modular invariants
Modular form 40.2.1.a
gp: x*deriv(xy[1])/(2*xy[2]+E.a1*xy[1]+E.a3)
Modular degree and optimality
Special L-value attached to the curve
sage: E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial()
gp: ar[2]/factorial(ar[1])
\( L(E,1) \) ≈ \( 0.742206236711 \)
Local data
| prime | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | ord(\(N\)) | ord(\(\Delta\)) | ord\((j)_{-}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(2\) | \(2\) | \( III^{*} \) | Additive | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| \(5\) | \(1\) | \( I_{1} \) | Split multiplicative | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Galois representations
The image of the 2-adic representation attached to this elliptic curve is the subgroup of $\GL(2,\Z_2)$ with Rouse label X115g.
This subgroup is the pull-back of the subgroup of $\GL(2,\Z_2/2^4\Z_2)$ generated by $\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 7 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 3 & 9 \\ 12 & 7 \end{array}\right)$ and has index 48.
sage: [rho.image_type(p) for p in rho.non_surjective()]
The mod \( p \) Galois representation has maximal image \(\GL(2,\F_p)\) for all primes \( p \) except those listed.
| prime | Image of Galois representation |
|---|---|
| \(2\) | B |
$p$-adic data
$p$-adic regulators
All \(p\)-adic regulators are identically \(1\) since the rank is \(0\).
Iwasawa invariants
| $p$ | 2 | 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reduction type | add | split |
| $\lambda$-invariant(s) | - | 5 |
| $\mu$-invariant(s) | - | 0 |
All Iwasawa $\lambda$ and $\mu$-invariants for primes $p\ge 3$ of good reduction are zero.
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree \(d\) for \(d=\)
2.
Its isogeny class 40.a
consists of 4 curves linked by isogenies of
degrees dividing 4.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree up to 7 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ $\cong \Z/{2}\Z$ are as follows:
| $[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base-change curve |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | \(\Q(\sqrt{-5}) \) | \(\Z/4\Z\) | Not in database |
| \(\Q(\sqrt{-1}) \) | \(\Z/4\Z\) | 2.0.4.1-200.2-a8 | |
| \(\Q(\sqrt{5}) \) | \(\Z/2\Z \times \Z/2\Z\) | 2.2.5.1-320.1-a6 | |
| 4 | 4.0.320.1 | \(\Z/8\Z\) | Not in database |
| 4.2.8000.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \times \Z/4\Z\) | Not in database | |
| \(\Q(i, \sqrt{5})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \times \Z/4\Z\) | Not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For each field $K$ we either show its label, or a defining polynomial when $K$ is not in the database.