Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
|
\(y^2=x^3-x^2-8653633x-9792120863\)
|
(homogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2z=x^3-x^2z-8653633xz^2-9792120863z^3\)
|
(dehomogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2=x^3-700944300x-7140558942000\)
|
(homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
\(\Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z\)
Mordell-Weil generators
| $P$ | $\hat{h}(P)$ | Order |
|---|---|---|
| $(-1673, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
| $(3397, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
Integral points
\( \left(-1723, 0\right) \), \( \left(-1673, 0\right) \), \( \left(3397, 0\right) \)
Invariants
| Conductor: | $N$ | = | \( 62400 \) | = | $2^{6} \cdot 3 \cdot 5^{2} \cdot 13$ |
|
| Discriminant: | $\Delta$ | = | $26953541222400000000$ | = | $2^{28} \cdot 3^{2} \cdot 5^{8} \cdot 13^{4} $ |
|
| j-invariant: | $j$ | = | \( \frac{17496824387403529}{6580454400} \) | = | $2^{-10} \cdot 3^{-2} \cdot 5^{-2} \cdot 7^{3} \cdot 13^{-4} \cdot 37087^{3}$ |
|
| Endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E)$ | = | $\Z$ | |||
| Geometric endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$ | = | \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication) |
|
||
| Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
| Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ | ≈ | $2.6951296137478426033103107077$ |
|
||
| Stable Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ | ≈ | $0.85068988669087445188408285890$ |
|
||
| $abc$ quality: | $Q$ | ≈ | $1.0072076908890615$ | |||
| Szpiro ratio: | $\sigma_{m}$ | ≈ | $5.391934074134354$ | |||
BSD invariants
| Analytic rank: | $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Mordell-Weil rank: | $r$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Regulator: | $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ | = | $1$ |
|
| Real period: | $\Omega$ | ≈ | $0.088025750143192645028142396949$ |
|
| Tamagawa product: | $\prod_{p}c_p$ | = | $ 64 $ = $ 2^{2}\cdot2\cdot2^{2}\cdot2 $ |
|
| Torsion order: | $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ | = | $4$ |
|
| Special value: | $ L(E,1)$ | ≈ | $3.1689270051549352210131262902 $ |
|
| Analytic order of Ш: | Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $9$ = $3^2$ (exact) |
|
BSD formula
$$\begin{aligned} 3.168927005 \approx L(E,1) & = \frac{\# ะจ(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{9 \cdot 0.088026 \cdot 1.000000 \cdot 64}{4^2} \\ & \approx 3.168927005\end{aligned}$$
Modular invariants
Modular form 62400.2.a.dz
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
| Modular degree: | 2949120 |
|
| $ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | no | |
| Manin constant: | 1 |
|
Local data at primes of bad reduction
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 4 primes $p$ of bad reduction:
| $p$ | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | $4$ | $I_{18}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 6 | 28 | 10 |
| $3$ | $2$ | $I_{2}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| $5$ | $4$ | $I_{2}^{*}$ | additive | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| $13$ | $2$ | $I_{4}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
| prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image |
|---|---|---|
| $2$ | 2Cs | 8.12.0.1 |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 120 = 2^{3} \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \), index $48$, genus $0$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 3 & 2 \\ 38 & 119 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 117 & 4 \\ 116 & 5 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 59 & 116 \\ 118 & 111 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 4 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 23 & 118 \\ 0 & 119 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 27 & 116 \\ 58 & 117 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[120])$ is a degree-$737280$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/120\Z)$.
The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.
| $\ell$ | Reduction type | Serre weight | Serre conductor |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | additive | $2$ | \( 25 = 5^{2} \) |
| $3$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $4$ | \( 20800 = 2^{6} \cdot 5^{2} \cdot 13 \) |
| $5$ | additive | $18$ | \( 2496 = 2^{6} \cdot 3 \cdot 13 \) |
| $13$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $14$ | \( 4800 = 2^{6} \cdot 3 \cdot 5^{2} \) |
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$
2.
Its isogeny class 62400.dz
consists of 4 curves linked by isogenies of
degrees dividing 4.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 390.c3, its twist by $-40$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ $\cong \Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z$ are as follows:
| $[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{5}, \sqrt{6})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-2}, \sqrt{-5})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{-15})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | deg 8 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | 16.0.11007531417600000000.1 | \(\Z/4\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
| $p$ | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction type | add | nonsplit | add | nonsplit |
| $\lambda$-invariant(s) | - | 4 | - | 0 |
| $\mu$-invariant(s) | - | 0 | - | 0 |
All Iwasawa $\lambda$ and $\mu$-invariants for primes $p\ge 5$ of good reduction are zero.
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
All $p$-adic regulators are identically $1$ since the rank is $0$.