Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
|
\(y^2+xy+y=x^3-4995558x-4297997442\)
|
(homogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2z+xyz+yz^2=x^3-4995558xz^2-4297997442z^3\)
|
(dehomogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2=x^3-6474242547x-200507945914674\)
|
(homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
trivial
Invariants
| Conductor: | $N$ | = | \( 92510 \) | = | $2 \cdot 5 \cdot 11 \cdot 29^{2}$ |
|
| Minimal Discriminant: | $\Delta$ | = | $-957968906703710$ | = | $-1 \cdot 2 \cdot 5 \cdot 11^{5} \cdot 29^{6} $ |
|
| j-invariant: | $j$ | = | \( -\frac{23178622194826561}{1610510} \) | = | $-1 \cdot 2^{-1} \cdot 5^{-1} \cdot 11^{-5} \cdot 285121^{3}$ |
|
| Endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E)$ | = | $\Z$ | |||
| Geometric endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$ | = | \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication) |
|
||
| Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
| Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ | ≈ | $2.3287234957560585037799233067$ |
|
||
| Stable Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ | ≈ | $0.64507558076282149018828729052$ |
|
||
| $abc$ quality: | $Q$ | ≈ | $1.0129363433875729$ | |||
| Szpiro ratio: | $\sigma_{m}$ | ≈ | $5.0621265665155395$ | |||
| Intrinsic torsion order: | $\#E(\mathbb Q)_\text{tors}^\text{is}$ | = | $1$ | |||
BSD invariants
| Analytic rank: | $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Mordell-Weil rank: | $r$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Regulator: | $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ | = | $1$ |
|
| Real period: | $\Omega$ | ≈ | $0.050492115409710215135837667750$ |
|
| Tamagawa product: | $\prod_{p}c_p$ | = | $ 1 $ |
|
| Torsion order: | $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ | = | $1$ |
|
| Special value: | $ L(E,1)$ | ≈ | $1.2623028852427553783959416937 $ |
|
| Analytic order of Ш: | Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $25$ = $5^2$ (exact) |
|
BSD formula
$$\begin{aligned} 1.262302885 \approx L(E,1) & = \frac{\# Ш(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{25 \cdot 0.050492 \cdot 1.000000 \cdot 1}{1^2} \\ & \approx 1.262302885\end{aligned}$$
Modular invariants
Modular form 92510.2.a.l
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
| Modular degree: | 2450000 |
|
| $ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | no | |
| Manin constant: | 1 |
|
Local data at primes of bad reduction
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 4 primes $p$ of bad reduction:
| $p$ | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | $1$ | $I_{1}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| $5$ | $1$ | $I_{1}$ | split multiplicative | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| $11$ | $1$ | $I_{5}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| $29$ | $1$ | $I_0^{*}$ | additive | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
| prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image | $\ell$-adic index |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5$ | 5B.4.2 | 5.12.0.2 | $12$ |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 12760 = 2^{3} \cdot 5 \cdot 11 \cdot 29 \), index $48$, genus $1$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 3191 & 11890 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 10119 & 0 \\ 0 & 12759 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 11166 & 12325 \\ 12035 & 436 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 6 & 13 \\ 12705 & 12641 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 3742 & 2755 \\ 10005 & 6236 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 10 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 10 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 12751 & 10 \\ 12750 & 11 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 12326 & 12325 \\ 6815 & 436 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[12760])$ is a degree-$138293084160000$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/12760\Z)$.
The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.
| $\ell$ | Reduction type | Serre weight | Serre conductor |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $4$ | \( 46255 = 5 \cdot 11 \cdot 29^{2} \) |
| $5$ | split multiplicative | $6$ | \( 1682 = 2 \cdot 29^{2} \) |
| $11$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $12$ | \( 8410 = 2 \cdot 5 \cdot 29^{2} \) |
| $29$ | additive | $422$ | \( 110 = 2 \cdot 5 \cdot 11 \) |
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$
5.
Its isogeny class 92510f
consists of 2 curves linked by isogenies of
degree 5.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 110a2, its twist by $29$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ (which is trivial) are as follows:
| $[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3$ | 3.1.440.1 | \(\Z/2\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-290 +58 \sqrt{5}})\) | \(\Z/5\Z\) | not in database |
| $6$ | 6.0.85184000.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | deg 8 | \(\Z/3\Z\) | not in database |
| $10$ | 10.2.20030418945312500000000.2 | \(\Z/5\Z\) | not in database |
| $12$ | deg 12 | \(\Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $12$ | deg 12 | \(\Z/10\Z\) | not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
| $p$ | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 43 | 47 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction type | nonsplit | ord | split | ord | nonsplit | ord | ord | ord | ord | add | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord |
| $\lambda$-invariant(s) | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| $\mu$-invariant(s) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
All $p$-adic regulators are identically $1$ since the rank is $0$.