↑

Properties

Label 8467200.tt1
Conductor $8467200$
Discriminant $-1.853\times 10^{16}$
j-invariant \( -1728 \)
CM no
Rank $1$
Torsion structure trivial

Related objects

Downloads

Learn more

Show commands: Magma / Oscar / Pari/GP / SageMath

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Simplified equation

\(y^2=x^3-66150x+9261000\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, simplify)
\(y^2z=x^3-66150xz^2+9261000z^3\) Copy content Toggle raw display (dehomogenize, simplify)
\(y^2=x^3-66150x+9261000\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, minimize)

Copy content comment:Define the curve
 
Copy content sage:E = EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000])
 
Copy content gp:E = ellinit([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000])
 
Copy content magma:E := EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000]);
 
Copy content oscar:E = elliptic_curve([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000])
 
Copy content comment:Simplified equation
 
Copy content sage:E.short_weierstrass_model()
 
Copy content magma:WeierstrassModel(E);
 
Copy content oscar:short_weierstrass_model(E)
 

Mordell-Weil group structure

\(\Z\)

Copy content comment:Mordell-Weil group
 
Copy content magma:MordellWeilGroup(E);
 

Mordell-Weil generators

$P$$\hat{h}(P)$Order
$(190306/169, 81100846/2197)$$11.876559771316273407962612738$$\infty$

Integral points

None

Copy content comment:Integral points
 
Copy content sage:E.integral_points()
 
Copy content magma:IntegralPoints(E);
 

Invariants

Conductor: $N$  =  \( 8467200 \) = $2^{8} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 5^{2} \cdot 7^{2}$
Copy content comment:Conductor
 
Copy content sage:E.conductor().factor()
 
Copy content gp:ellglobalred(E)[1]
 
Copy content magma:Conductor(E);
 
Copy content oscar:conductor(E)
 
Discriminant: $\Delta$  =  $-18525482136000000$ = $-1 \cdot 2^{9} \cdot 3^{9} \cdot 5^{6} \cdot 7^{6} $
Copy content comment:Discriminant
 
Copy content sage:E.discriminant().factor()
 
Copy content gp:E.disc
 
Copy content magma:Discriminant(E);
 
Copy content oscar:discriminant(E)
 
j-invariant: $j$  =  \( -1728 \) = $-1 \cdot 2^{6} \cdot 3^{3}$
Copy content comment:j-invariant
 
Copy content sage:E.j_invariant().factor()
 
Copy content gp:E.j
 
Copy content magma:jInvariant(E);
 
Copy content oscar:j_invariant(E)
 
Endomorphism ring: $\mathrm{End}(E)$ = $\Z$
Geometric endomorphism ring: $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$  =  \(\Z\)    (no potential complex multiplication)
Copy content comment:Potential complex multiplication
 
Copy content sage:E.has_cm()
 
Copy content magma:HasComplexMultiplication(E);
 
Sato-Tate group: $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ = $\mathrm{SU}(2)$
Faltings height: $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ ≈ $1.8242843670026465507665221347$
Copy content comment:Faltings height
 
Copy content gp:ellheight(E)
 
Copy content magma:FaltingsHeight(E);
 
Copy content oscar:faltings_height(E)
 
Stable Faltings height: $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ ≈ $-1.2972092656631015396958919224$
Copy content comment:Stable Faltings height
 
Copy content magma:StableFaltingsHeight(E);
 
Copy content oscar:stable_faltings_height(E)
 
$abc$ quality: $Q$ ≈ $1.0$
Szpiro ratio: $\sigma_{m}$ ≈ $2.858990633771995$

BSD invariants

Analytic rank: $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ = $ 1$
Copy content comment:Analytic rank
 
Copy content sage:E.analytic_rank()
 
Copy content gp:ellanalyticrank(E)
 
Copy content magma:AnalyticRank(E);
 
Mordell-Weil rank: $r$ = $ 1$
Copy content comment:Mordell-Weil rank
 
Copy content sage:E.rank()
 
Copy content gp:[lower,upper] = ellrank(E)
 
Copy content magma:Rank(E);
 
Regulator: $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ ≈ $11.876559771316273407962612738$
Copy content comment:Regulator
 
Copy content sage:E.regulator()
 
Copy content gp:G = E.gen \\ if available matdet(ellheightmatrix(E,G))
 
Copy content magma:Regulator(E);
 
Real period: $\Omega$ ≈ $0.35905972454996751618650283923$
Copy content comment:Real Period
 
Copy content sage:E.period_lattice().omega()
 
Copy content gp:if(E.disc>0,2,1)*E.omega[1]
 
Copy content magma:(Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1) * RealPeriod(E);
 
Tamagawa product: $\prod_{p}c_p$ = $ 2 $  = $ 2\cdot1\cdot1\cdot1 $
Copy content comment:Tamagawa numbers
 
Copy content sage:E.tamagawa_numbers()
 
Copy content gp:gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
 
Copy content magma:TamagawaNumbers(E);
 
Copy content oscar:tamagawa_numbers(E)
 
Torsion order: $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ = $1$
Copy content comment:Torsion order
 
Copy content sage:E.torsion_order()
 
Copy content gp:elltors(E)[1]
 
Copy content magma:Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
 
Copy content oscar:prod(torsion_structure(E)[1])
 
Special value: $ L'(E,1)$ ≈ $8.5287885601800926496858923725 $
Copy content comment:Special L-value
 
Copy content sage:r = E.rank(); E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial()
 
Copy content gp:[r,L1r] = ellanalyticrank(E); L1r/r!
 
Copy content magma:Lr1 where r,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision:=12);
 
Analytic order of Ш: Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$  ≈  $1$    (rounded)
Copy content comment:Order of Sha
 
Copy content sage:E.sha().an_numerical()
 
Copy content magma:MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
 

BSD formula

$$\begin{aligned} 8.528788560 \approx L'(E,1) & = \frac{\# ะจ(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.359060 \cdot 11.876560 \cdot 2}{1^2} \\ & \approx 8.528788560\end{aligned}$$

Copy content comment:BSD formula
 
Copy content sage:# self-contained SageMath code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analytic sha) E = EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000]); r = E.rank(); ar = E.analytic_rank(); assert r == ar; Lr1 = E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial(); sha = E.sha().an_numerical(); omega = E.period_lattice().omega(); reg = E.regulator(); tam = E.tamagawa_product(); tor = E.torsion_order(); assert r == ar; print("analytic sha: " + str(RR(Lr1) * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam)))
 
Copy content magma:/* self-contained Magma code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analytic sha) */ E := EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -66150, 9261000]); r := Rank(E); ar,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision := 12); assert r eq ar; sha := MordellWeilShaInformation(E); omega := RealPeriod(E) * (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1); reg := Regulator(E); tam := &*TamagawaNumbers(E); tor := #TorsionSubgroup(E); assert r eq ar; print "analytic sha:", Lr1 * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam);
 

Modular invariants

Modular form 8467200.2.a.tt

\( q + 3 q^{11} - 6 q^{13} + 6 q^{17} - 2 q^{19} + O(q^{20}) \) Copy content Toggle raw display

Copy content comment:q-expansion of modular form
 
Copy content sage:E.q_eigenform(20)
 
Copy content gp:\\ actual modular form, use for small N [mf,F] = mffromell(E) Ser(mfcoefs(mf,20),q) \\ or just the series Ser(ellan(E,20),q)*q
 
Copy content magma:ModularForm(E);
 

For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.

Modular degree: 61585920
Copy content comment:Modular degree
 
Copy content sage:E.modular_degree()
 
Copy content gp:ellmoddegree(E)
 
Copy content magma:ModularDegree(E);
 

Local data at primes of bad reduction

This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 4 primes $p$ of bad reduction:

$p$ Tamagawa number Kodaira symbol Reduction type Root number $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$
$2$ $2$ $III$ additive -1 8 9 0
$3$ $1$ $IV^{*}$ additive 1 3 9 0
$5$ $1$ $I_0^{*}$ additive 1 2 6 0
$7$ $1$ $I_0^{*}$ additive -1 2 6 0

Copy content comment:Local data
 
Copy content sage:E.local_data()
 
Copy content gp:ellglobalred(E)[5]
 
Copy content magma:[LocalInformation(E,p) : p in BadPrimes(E)];
 
Copy content oscar:[(p,tamagawa_number(E,p), kodaira_symbol(E,p), reduction_type(E,p)) for p in bad_primes(E)]
 

Galois representations

The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.

prime $\ell$ mod-$\ell$ image $\ell$-adic image
$3$ 3Ns 3.6.0.1

Copy content comment:Mod p Galois image
 
Copy content sage:rho = E.galois_representation(); [rho.image_type(p) for p in rho.non_surjective()]
 
Copy content magma:[GaloisRepresentation(E,p): p in PrimesUpTo(20)];
 

Copy content comment:Adelic image of Galois representation
 
Copy content sage:gens = [[19, 6, 18, 7], [1, 0, 6, 1], [4, 15, 9, 14], [2, 3, 3, 5], [21, 2, 4, 3], [1, 6, 0, 1], [6, 5, 19, 6]] GL(2,Integers(24)).subgroup(gens)
 
Copy content magma:Gens := [[19, 6, 18, 7], [1, 0, 6, 1], [4, 15, 9, 14], [2, 3, 3, 5], [21, 2, 4, 3], [1, 6, 0, 1], [6, 5, 19, 6]]; sub<GL(2,Integers(24))|Gens>;
 

The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has label 24.24.1.ck.1, level \( 24 = 2^{3} \cdot 3 \), index $24$, genus $1$, and generators

$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 19 & 6 \\ 18 & 7 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 6 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 4 & 15 \\ 9 & 14 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & 3 \\ 3 & 5 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 21 & 2 \\ 4 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 6 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 6 & 5 \\ 19 & 6 \end{array}\right)$.

Input positive integer $m$ to see the generators of the reduction of $H$ to $\mathrm{GL}_2(\Z/m\Z)$:

The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[24])$ is a degree-$3072$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/24\Z)$.

The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.

$\ell$ Reduction type Serre weight Serre conductor
$2$ additive $4$ \( 33075 = 3^{3} \cdot 5^{2} \cdot 7^{2} \)
$3$ additive $2$ \( 4480 = 2^{7} \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \)
$5$ additive $14$ \( 338688 = 2^{8} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 7^{2} \)
$7$ additive $26$ \( 172800 = 2^{8} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 5^{2} \)

Isogenies

Copy content comment:Isogenies
 
Copy content gp:ellisomat(E)
 

This curve has no rational isogenies. Its isogeny class 8467200.tt consists of this curve only.

Twists

The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 6912.a1, its twist by $140$.

Iwasawa invariants

No Iwasawa invariant data is available for this curve.

$p$-adic regulators

$p$-adic regulators are not yet computed for curves that are not $\Gamma_0$-optimal.