Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
|
\(y^2+xy=x^3+x^2-1454x+100302\)
|
(homogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2z+xyz=x^3+x^2z-1454xz^2+100302z^3\)
|
(dehomogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2=x^3-1885059x+4707962622\)
|
(homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
\(\Z/{2}\Z\)
Mordell-Weil generators
| $P$ | $\hat{h}(P)$ | Order |
|---|---|---|
| $(-229/4, 229/8)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
Integral points
None
Invariants
| Conductor: | $N$ | = | \( 726 \) | = | $2 \cdot 3 \cdot 11^{2}$ |
|
| Discriminant: | $\Delta$ | = | $-4201862785362$ | = | $-1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3^{4} \cdot 11^{10} $ |
|
| j-invariant: | $j$ | = | \( -\frac{192100033}{2371842} \) | = | $-1 \cdot 2^{-1} \cdot 3^{-4} \cdot 11^{-4} \cdot 577^{3}$ |
|
| Endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E)$ | = | $\Z$ | |||
| Geometric endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$ | = | \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication) |
|
||
| Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
| Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ | ≈ | $1.1039937355485144005447149799$ |
|
||
| Stable Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ | ≈ | $-0.094953900850670871486256809082$ |
|
||
| $abc$ quality: | $Q$ | ≈ | $1.0250656507343525$ | |||
| Szpiro ratio: | $\sigma_{m}$ | ≈ | $5.5509368427869425$ | |||
BSD invariants
| Analytic rank: | $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Mordell-Weil rank: | $r$ | = | $ 0$ |
|
| Regulator: | $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ | = | $1$ |
|
| Real period: | $\Omega$ | ≈ | $0.66153389354131456201320487725$ |
|
| Tamagawa product: | $\prod_{p}c_p$ | = | $ 8 $ = $ 1\cdot2\cdot2^{2} $ |
|
| Torsion order: | $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ | = | $2$ |
|
| Special value: | $ L(E,1)$ | ≈ | $1.3230677870826291240264097545 $ |
|
| Analytic order of Ш: | Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $1$ (exact) |
|
BSD formula
$$\begin{aligned} 1.323067787 \approx L(E,1) & = \frac{\# ะจ(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.661534 \cdot 1.000000 \cdot 8}{2^2} \\ & \approx 1.323067787\end{aligned}$$
Modular invariants
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
| Modular degree: | 1920 |
|
| $ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | no | |
| Manin constant: | 1 |
|
Local data at primes of bad reduction
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 3 primes $p$ of bad reduction:
| $p$ | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | $1$ | $I_{1}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| $3$ | $2$ | $I_{4}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| $11$ | $4$ | $I_{4}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 2 | 10 | 4 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
| prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image |
|---|---|---|
| $2$ | 2B | 8.12.0.16 |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 264 = 2^{3} \cdot 3 \cdot 11 \), index $48$, genus $0$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 89 & 8 \\ 92 & 33 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 8 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 232 & 107 \\ 169 & 198 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 168 & 41 \\ 193 & 240 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 8 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 7 & 6 \\ 258 & 259 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 4 \\ 4 & 17 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 257 & 8 \\ 256 & 9 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 119 & 256 \\ 212 & 231 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[264])$ is a degree-$20275200$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/264\Z)$.
The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.
| $\ell$ | Reduction type | Serre weight | Serre conductor |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $4$ | \( 121 = 11^{2} \) |
| $3$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $4$ | \( 242 = 2 \cdot 11^{2} \) |
| $11$ | additive | $72$ | \( 6 = 2 \cdot 3 \) |
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$
2 and 4.
Its isogeny class 726c
consists of 4 curves linked by isogenies of
degrees dividing 4.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 66b4, its twist by $-11$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ $\cong \Z/{2}\Z$ are as follows:
| $[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-2}) \) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z\) | not in database |
| $2$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{11}) \) | \(\Z/4\Z\) | 2.2.44.1-198.1-a1 |
| $2$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-22}) \) | \(\Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-2}, \sqrt{11})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | 8.0.61408804864.16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | 8.4.4857532416.6 | \(\Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | 8.0.4974113193984.84 | \(\Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | 8.2.5021227463472.4 | \(\Z/6\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/4\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
| $p$ | 2 | 3 | 11 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction type | nonsplit | nonsplit | add |
| $\lambda$-invariant(s) | 1 | 0 | - |
| $\mu$-invariant(s) | 1 | 0 | - |
All Iwasawa $\lambda$ and $\mu$-invariants for primes $p\ge 3$ of good reduction are zero.
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
All $p$-adic regulators are identically $1$ since the rank is $0$.