↑

Properties

Label 5184a4
Conductor $5184$
Discriminant $-1.783\times 10^{13}$
j-invariant \( -\frac{189613868625}{128} \)
CM no
Rank $1$
Torsion structure trivial

Related objects

Downloads

Learn more

Show commands: Magma / Oscar / Pari/GP / SageMath

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Simplified equation

\(y^2=x^3-620460x-188113104\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, simplify)
\(y^2z=x^3-620460xz^2-188113104z^3\) Copy content Toggle raw display (dehomogenize, simplify)
\(y^2=x^3-620460x-188113104\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, minimize)

Copy content comment:Define the curve
 
Copy content sage:E = EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104])
 
Copy content gp:E = ellinit([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104])
 
Copy content magma:E := EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104]);
 
Copy content oscar:E = elliptic_curve([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104])
 
Copy content comment:Simplified equation
 
Copy content sage:E.short_weierstrass_model()
 
Copy content magma:WeierstrassModel(E);
 
Copy content oscar:short_weierstrass_model(E)
 

Mordell-Weil group structure

\(\Z\)

Copy content comment:Mordell-Weil group
 
Copy content magma:MordellWeilGroup(E);
 

Mordell-Weil generators

$P$$\hat{h}(P)$Order
$(5076310/289, 11425560832/4913)$$12.173207410142137524891005056$$\infty$

Integral points

None

Copy content comment:Integral points
 
Copy content sage:E.integral_points()
 
Copy content magma:IntegralPoints(E);
 

Invariants

Conductor: $N$  =  \( 5184 \) = $2^{6} \cdot 3^{4}$
Copy content comment:Conductor
 
Copy content sage:E.conductor().factor()
 
Copy content gp:ellglobalred(E)[1]
 
Copy content magma:Conductor(E);
 
Copy content oscar:conductor(E)
 
Discriminant: $\Delta$  =  $-17832200896512$ = $-1 \cdot 2^{25} \cdot 3^{12} $
Copy content comment:Discriminant
 
Copy content sage:E.discriminant().factor()
 
Copy content gp:E.disc
 
Copy content magma:Discriminant(E);
 
Copy content oscar:discriminant(E)
 
j-invariant: $j$  =  \( -\frac{189613868625}{128} \) = $-1 \cdot 2^{-7} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 5^{3} \cdot 383^{3}$
Copy content comment:j-invariant
 
Copy content sage:E.j_invariant().factor()
 
Copy content gp:E.j
 
Copy content magma:jInvariant(E);
 
Copy content oscar:j_invariant(E)
 
Endomorphism ring: $\mathrm{End}(E)$ = $\Z$
Geometric endomorphism ring: $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$  =  \(\Z\)    (no potential complex multiplication)
Copy content comment:Potential complex multiplication
 
Copy content sage:E.has_cm()
 
Copy content magma:HasComplexMultiplication(E);
 
Sato-Tate group: $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ = $\mathrm{SU}(2)$
Faltings height: $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ ≈ $1.8583949940516129916543110514$
Copy content comment:Faltings height
 
Copy content gp:ellheight(E)
 
Copy content magma:FaltingsHeight(E);
 
Copy content oscar:faltings_height(E)
 
Stable Faltings height: $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ ≈ $-0.27993806545641466386678236771$
Copy content comment:Stable Faltings height
 
Copy content magma:StableFaltingsHeight(E);
 
Copy content oscar:stable_faltings_height(E)
 
$abc$ quality: $Q$ ≈ $1.1259568215438134$
Szpiro ratio: $\sigma_{m}$ ≈ $6.03603975791772$

BSD invariants

Analytic rank: $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ = $ 1$
Copy content comment:Analytic rank
 
Copy content sage:E.analytic_rank()
 
Copy content gp:ellanalyticrank(E)
 
Copy content magma:AnalyticRank(E);
 
Mordell-Weil rank: $r$ = $ 1$
Copy content comment:Mordell-Weil rank
 
Copy content sage:E.rank()
 
Copy content gp:[lower,upper] = ellrank(E)
 
Copy content magma:Rank(E);
 
Regulator: $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ ≈ $12.173207410142137524891005056$
Copy content comment:Regulator
 
Copy content sage:E.regulator()
 
Copy content gp:G = E.gen \\ if available matdet(ellheightmatrix(E,G))
 
Copy content magma:Regulator(E);
 
Real period: $\Omega$ ≈ $0.085053285457144159536686977062$
Copy content comment:Real Period
 
Copy content sage:E.period_lattice().omega()
 
Copy content gp:if(E.disc>0,2,1)*E.omega[1]
 
Copy content magma:(Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1) * RealPeriod(E);
 
Tamagawa product: $\prod_{p}c_p$ = $ 4 $  = $ 2^{2}\cdot1 $
Copy content comment:Tamagawa numbers
 
Copy content sage:E.tamagawa_numbers()
 
Copy content gp:gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
 
Copy content magma:TamagawaNumbers(E);
 
Copy content oscar:tamagawa_numbers(E)
 
Torsion order: $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ = $1$
Copy content comment:Torsion order
 
Copy content sage:E.torsion_order()
 
Copy content gp:elltors(E)[1]
 
Copy content magma:Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
 
Copy content oscar:prod(torsion_structure(E)[1])
 
Special value: $ L'(E,1)$ ≈ $4.1414851391353671351557866494 $
Copy content comment:Special L-value
 
Copy content sage:r = E.rank(); E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial()
 
Copy content gp:[r,L1r] = ellanalyticrank(E); L1r/r!
 
Copy content magma:Lr1 where r,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision:=12);
 
Analytic order of Ш: Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$  ≈  $1$    (rounded)
Copy content comment:Order of Sha
 
Copy content sage:E.sha().an_numerical()
 
Copy content magma:MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
 

BSD formula

$$\begin{aligned} 4.141485139 \approx L'(E,1) & = \frac{\# ะจ(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.085053 \cdot 12.173207 \cdot 4}{1^2} \\ & \approx 4.141485139\end{aligned}$$

Copy content comment:BSD formula
 
Copy content sage:# self-contained SageMath code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analytic sha) E = EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104]); r = E.rank(); ar = E.analytic_rank(); assert r == ar; Lr1 = E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial(); sha = E.sha().an_numerical(); omega = E.period_lattice().omega(); reg = E.regulator(); tam = E.tamagawa_product(); tor = E.torsion_order(); assert r == ar; print("analytic sha: " + str(RR(Lr1) * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam)))
 
Copy content magma:/* self-contained Magma code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analytic sha) */ E := EllipticCurve([0, 0, 0, -620460, -188113104]); r := Rank(E); ar,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision := 12); assert r eq ar; sha := MordellWeilShaInformation(E); omega := RealPeriod(E) * (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1); reg := Regulator(E); tam := &*TamagawaNumbers(E); tor := #TorsionSubgroup(E); assert r eq ar; print "analytic sha:", Lr1 * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam);
 

Modular invariants

Modular form   5184.2.a.r

\( q + 2 q^{7} + 3 q^{11} - 2 q^{13} - 3 q^{17} + q^{19} + O(q^{20}) \) Copy content Toggle raw display

Copy content comment:q-expansion of modular form
 
Copy content sage:E.q_eigenform(20)
 
Copy content gp:\\ actual modular form, use for small N [mf,F] = mffromell(E) Ser(mfcoefs(mf,20),q) \\ or just the series Ser(ellan(E,20),q)*q
 
Copy content magma:ModularForm(E);
 

For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.

Modular degree: 24192
Copy content comment:Modular degree
 
Copy content sage:E.modular_degree()
 
Copy content gp:ellmoddegree(E)
 
Copy content magma:ModularDegree(E);
 
$ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: no
Manin constant: 1
Copy content comment:Manin constant
 
Copy content magma:ManinConstant(E);
 

Local data at primes of bad reduction

This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 2 primes $p$ of bad reduction:

$p$ Tamagawa number Kodaira symbol Reduction type Root number $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$
$2$ $4$ $I_{15}^{*}$ additive 1 6 25 7
$3$ $1$ $II^{*}$ additive 1 4 12 0

Copy content comment:Local data
 
Copy content sage:E.local_data()
 
Copy content gp:ellglobalred(E)[5]
 
Copy content magma:[LocalInformation(E,p) : p in BadPrimes(E)];
 
Copy content oscar:[(p,tamagawa_number(E,p), kodaira_symbol(E,p), reduction_type(E,p)) for p in bad_primes(E)]
 

Galois representations

The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.

prime $\ell$ mod-$\ell$ image $\ell$-adic image
$2$ 2G 8.2.0.1
$3$ 3B 3.4.0.1
$7$ 7B 7.8.0.1

Copy content comment:Mod p Galois image
 
Copy content sage:rho = E.galois_representation(); [rho.image_type(p) for p in rho.non_surjective()]
 
Copy content magma:[GaloisRepresentation(E,p): p in PrimesUpTo(20)];
 

Copy content comment:Adelic image of Galois representation
 
Copy content sage:gens = [[281, 392, 112, 393], [73, 402, 0, 1], [1, 426, 42, 253], [39, 62, 56, 303], [1, 216, 0, 1], [1, 0, 462, 1], [337, 168, 336, 169], [1, 0, 168, 1], [419, 462, 315, 461], [295, 42, 231, 211], [22, 321, 189, 169], [1, 0, 420, 1], [1, 168, 0, 1], [463, 282, 420, 295]] GL(2,Integers(504)).subgroup(gens)
 
Copy content magma:Gens := [[281, 392, 112, 393], [73, 402, 0, 1], [1, 426, 42, 253], [39, 62, 56, 303], [1, 216, 0, 1], [1, 0, 462, 1], [337, 168, 336, 169], [1, 0, 168, 1], [419, 462, 315, 461], [295, 42, 231, 211], [22, 321, 189, 169], [1, 0, 420, 1], [1, 168, 0, 1], [463, 282, 420, 295]]; sub<GL(2,Integers(504))|Gens>;
 

The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 504 = 2^{3} \cdot 3^{2} \cdot 7 \), index $768$, genus $21$, and generators

$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 281 & 392 \\ 112 & 393 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 73 & 402 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 426 \\ 42 & 253 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 39 & 62 \\ 56 & 303 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 216 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 462 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 337 & 168 \\ 336 & 169 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 168 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 419 & 462 \\ 315 & 461 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 295 & 42 \\ 231 & 211 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 22 & 321 \\ 189 & 169 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 420 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 168 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 463 & 282 \\ 420 & 295 \end{array}\right)$.

Input positive integer $m$ to see the generators of the reduction of $H$ to $\mathrm{GL}_2(\Z/m\Z)$:

The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[504])$ is a degree-$15676416$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/504\Z)$.

The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.

$\ell$ Reduction type Serre weight Serre conductor
$2$ additive $4$ \( 81 = 3^{4} \)
$3$ additive $2$ \( 64 = 2^{6} \)

Isogenies

Copy content comment:Isogenies
 
Copy content gp:ellisomat(E)
 

This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$ 3, 7 and 21.
Its isogeny class 5184a consists of 4 curves linked by isogenies of degrees dividing 21.

Twists

The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 162c3, its twist by $-24$.

Growth of torsion in number fields

The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ (which is trivial) are as follows:

$[K:\Q]$ $K$ $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ Base change curve
$2$ \(\Q(\sqrt{-6}) \) \(\Z/3\Z\) not in database
$3$ 3.1.648.1 \(\Z/2\Z\) not in database
$6$ 6.0.3359232.4 \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z\) not in database
$6$ 6.2.1492992.4 \(\Z/3\Z\) not in database
$6$ 6.0.56458612224.1 \(\Z/7\Z\) not in database
$6$ 6.0.40310784.2 \(\Z/6\Z\) not in database
$12$ 12.2.5777633090469888.3 \(\Z/4\Z\) not in database
$12$ 12.0.20061226008576.9 \(\Z/3\Z \oplus \Z/3\Z\) not in database
$12$ 12.0.6499837226778624.48 \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) not in database
$12$ 12.0.28688174048340020035584.4 \(\Z/21\Z\) not in database
$18$ 18.0.704926469821837538733689143296.1 \(\Z/9\Z\) not in database
$18$ 18.2.28297461724253869811171328.1 \(\Z/6\Z\) not in database
$18$ 18.0.11517827512958929223747041688027136.1 \(\Z/14\Z\) not in database

We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive.

Iwasawa invariants

$p$ 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47
Reduction type add add ss ord ord ord ord ord ord ord ord ord ord ord ord
$\lambda$-invariant(s) - - 1,7 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
$\mu$-invariant(s) - - 0,0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.

$p$-adic regulators

$p$-adic regulators are not yet computed for curves that are not $\Gamma_0$-optimal.