Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
|
\(y^2=x^3-346675x-63540750\)
|
(homogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2z=x^3-346675xz^2-63540750z^3\)
|
(dehomogenize, simplify) |
|
\(y^2=x^3-346675x-63540750\)
|
(homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
\(\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z\)
Mordell-Weil generators
| $P$ | $\hat{h}(P)$ | Order |
|---|---|---|
| $(5719, 430122)$ | $5.0953222293759238160943061074$ | $\infty$ |
| $(-210, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
| $(665, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
Integral points
\( \left(-455, 0\right) \), \( \left(-210, 0\right) \), \( \left(665, 0\right) \), \((5719,\pm 430122)\)
Invariants
| Conductor: | $N$ | = | \( 19600 \) | = | $2^{4} \cdot 5^{2} \cdot 7^{2}$ |
|
| Discriminant: | $\Delta$ | = | $922368160000000000$ | = | $2^{14} \cdot 5^{10} \cdot 7^{8} $ |
|
| j-invariant: | $j$ | = | \( \frac{611960049}{122500} \) | = | $2^{-2} \cdot 3^{3} \cdot 5^{-4} \cdot 7^{-2} \cdot 283^{3}$ |
|
| Endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E)$ | = | $\Z$ | |||
| Geometric endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$ | = | \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication) |
|
||
| Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
| Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ | ≈ | $2.1632352926393157409593780834$ |
|
||
| Stable Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ | ≈ | $-0.30758591866533640831091007639$ |
|
||
| $abc$ quality: | $Q$ | ≈ | $1.02632404766684$ | |||
| Szpiro ratio: | $\sigma_{m}$ | ≈ | $5.047110639406703$ | |||
BSD invariants
| Analytic rank: | $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $ 1$ |
|
| Mordell-Weil rank: | $r$ | = | $ 1$ |
|
| Regulator: | $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ | ≈ | $5.0953222293759238160943061074$ |
|
| Real period: | $\Omega$ | ≈ | $0.19950784807355396309866268166$ |
|
| Tamagawa product: | $\prod_{p}c_p$ | = | $ 64 $ = $ 2^{2}\cdot2^{2}\cdot2^{2} $ |
|
| Torsion order: | $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ | = | $4$ |
|
| Special value: | $ L'(E,1)$ | ≈ | $4.0662270928965363471849405803 $ |
|
| Analytic order of Ш: | Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$ | ≈ | $1$ (rounded) |
|
BSD formula
$$\begin{aligned} 4.066227093 \approx L'(E,1) & = \frac{\# ะจ(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \\ & \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.199508 \cdot 5.095322 \cdot 64}{4^2} \\ & \approx 4.066227093\end{aligned}$$
Modular invariants
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
| Modular degree: | 221184 |
|
| $ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | no | |
| Manin constant: | 1 |
|
Local data at primes of bad reduction
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 3 primes $p$ of bad reduction:
| $p$ | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | $4$ | $I_{6}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 4 | 14 | 2 |
| $5$ | $4$ | $I_{4}^{*}$ | additive | 1 | 2 | 10 | 4 |
| $7$ | $4$ | $I_{2}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
| prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image |
|---|---|---|
| $2$ | 2Cs | 8.12.0.3 |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 280 = 2^{3} \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \), index $48$, genus $0$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 141 & 170 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 277 & 4 \\ 276 & 5 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 4 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 229 & 110 \\ 90 & 169 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 223 & 0 \\ 0 & 279 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 209 & 110 \\ 0 & 279 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[280])$ is a degree-$30965760$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/280\Z)$.
The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.
| $\ell$ | Reduction type | Serre weight | Serre conductor |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2$ | additive | $2$ | \( 1225 = 5^{2} \cdot 7^{2} \) |
| $5$ | additive | $18$ | \( 784 = 2^{4} \cdot 7^{2} \) |
| $7$ | additive | $32$ | \( 400 = 2^{4} \cdot 5^{2} \) |
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$
2.
Its isogeny class 19600cc
consists of 4 curves linked by isogenies of
degrees dividing 4.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 70a2, its twist by $140$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ $\cong \Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z$ are as follows:
| $[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-5}, \sqrt{14})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{5}, \sqrt{-7})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{35})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $8$ | deg 8 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | 16.0.9671731157401600000000.1 | \(\Z/4\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
| $16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
| $p$ | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 43 | 47 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction type | add | ss | add | add | ord | ord | ord | ss | ss | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord |
| $\lambda$-invariant(s) | - | 1,3 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1,1 | 1,9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| $\mu$-invariant(s) | - | 0,0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
$p$-adic regulators are not yet computed for curves that are not $\Gamma_0$-optimal.