↑

Properties

Label 7935.i1
Conductor $7935$
Discriminant $-153217145115$
j-invariant \( -\frac{262144}{1035} \)
CM no
Rank $0$
Torsion structure trivial

Related objects

Downloads

Learn more

Show commands: Magma / Oscar / PariGP / SageMath

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Minimal Weierstrass equation

Simplified equation

\(y^2+y=x^3+x^2-705x-20401\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, simplify)
\(y^2z+yz^2=x^3+x^2z-705xz^2-20401z^3\) Copy content Toggle raw display (dehomogenize, simplify)
\(y^2=x^3-914112x-940849776\) Copy content Toggle raw display (homogenize, minimize)

comment: Define the curve
 
sage: E = EllipticCurve([0, 1, 1, -705, -20401])
 
gp: E = ellinit([0, 1, 1, -705, -20401])
 
magma: E := EllipticCurve([0, 1, 1, -705, -20401]);
 
oscar: E = EllipticCurve([0, 1, 1, -705, -20401])
 
sage: E.short_weierstrass_model()
 
magma: WeierstrassModel(E);
 
oscar: short_weierstrass_model(E)
 

Mordell-Weil group structure

trivial

magma: MordellWeilGroup(E);
 

Integral points

None

comment: Integral points
 
sage: E.integral_points()
 
magma: IntegralPoints(E);
 

Invariants

Conductor: \( 7935 \)  =  $3 \cdot 5 \cdot 23^{2}$
comment: Conductor
 
sage: E.conductor().factor()
 
gp: ellglobalred(E)[1]
 
magma: Conductor(E);
 
oscar: conductor(E)
 
Discriminant: $-153217145115 $  =  $-1 \cdot 3^{2} \cdot 5 \cdot 23^{7} $
comment: Discriminant
 
sage: E.discriminant().factor()
 
gp: E.disc
 
magma: Discriminant(E);
 
oscar: discriminant(E)
 
j-invariant: \( -\frac{262144}{1035} \)  =  $-1 \cdot 2^{18} \cdot 3^{-2} \cdot 5^{-1} \cdot 23^{-1}$
comment: j-invariant
 
sage: E.j_invariant().factor()
 
gp: E.j
 
magma: jInvariant(E);
 
oscar: j_invariant(E)
 
Endomorphism ring: $\Z$
Geometric endomorphism ring: \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication)
sage: E.has_cm()
 
magma: HasComplexMultiplication(E);
 
Sato-Tate group: $\mathrm{SU}(2)$
Faltings height: $0.83166815098524409341914958216\dots$
gp: ellheight(E)
 
magma: FaltingsHeight(E);
 
oscar: faltings_height(E)
 
Stable Faltings height: $-0.73607895697933075198422683374\dots$
magma: StableFaltingsHeight(E);
 
oscar: stable_faltings_height(E)
 

BSD invariants

Analytic rank: $0$
sage: E.analytic_rank()
 
gp: ellanalyticrank(E)
 
magma: AnalyticRank(E);
 
Regulator: $1$
comment: Regulator
 
sage: E.regulator()
 
G = E.gen \\ if available
 
matdet(ellheightmatrix(E,G))
 
magma: Regulator(E);
 
Real period: $0.42293515545779260231405776925\dots$
comment: Real Period
 
sage: E.period_lattice().omega()
 
gp: if(E.disc>0,2,1)*E.omega[1]
 
magma: (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1) * RealPeriod(E);
 
Tamagawa product: $ 8 $  = $ 2\cdot1\cdot2^{2} $
comment: Tamagawa numbers
 
sage: E.tamagawa_numbers()
 
gp: gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
 
magma: TamagawaNumbers(E);
 
oscar: tamagawa_numbers(E)
 
Torsion order: $1$
comment: Torsion order
 
sage: E.torsion_order()
 
gp: elltors(E)[1]
 
magma: Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
 
oscar: prod(torsion_structure(E)[1])
 
Analytic order of Ш: $1$ (exact)
comment: Order of Sha
 
sage: E.sha().an_numerical()
 
magma: MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
 
Special value: $ L(E,1) $ ≈ $ 3.3834812436623408185124621540 $
comment: Special L-value
 
r = E.rank();
 
E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial()
 
gp: [r,L1r] = ellanalyticrank(E); L1r/r!
 
magma: Lr1 where r,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision:=12);
 

BSD formula

$\displaystyle 3.383481244 \approx L(E,1) = \frac{\# Ш(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.422935 \cdot 1.000000 \cdot 8}{1^2} \approx 3.383481244$

# self-contained SageMath code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analytic sha)
 
E = EllipticCurve(%s); r = E.rank(); ar = E.analytic_rank(); assert r == ar;
 
Lr1 = E.lseries().dokchitser().derivative(1,r)/r.factorial(); sha = E.sha().an_numerical();
 
omega = E.period_lattice().omega(); reg = E.regulator(); tam = E.tamagawa_product(); tor = E.torsion_order();
 
assert r == ar; print("anayltic sha: " + str(RR(Lr1) * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam)))
 
/* self-contained Magma code snippet for the BSD formula (checks rank, computes analyiic sha) */
 
E := EllipticCurve(%s); r := Rank(E); ar,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision := 12); assert r eq ar;
 
sha := MordellWeilShaInformation(E); omega := RealPeriod(E) * (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1);
 
reg := Regulator(E); tam := &*TamagawaNumbers(E); tor := #TorsionSubgroup(E);
 
assert r eq ar; print "analytic sha:", Lr1 * tor^2 / (omega * reg * tam);
 

Modular invariants

Modular form   7935.2.a.i

\( q + q^{3} - 2 q^{4} + q^{5} + 3 q^{7} + q^{9} + 4 q^{11} - 2 q^{12} + q^{15} + 4 q^{16} + 3 q^{17} + 8 q^{19} + O(q^{20}) \) Copy content Toggle raw display

comment: q-expansion of modular form
 
sage: E.q_eigenform(20)
 
\\ actual modular form, use for small N
 
[mf,F] = mffromell(E)
 
Ser(mfcoefs(mf,20),q)
 
\\ or just the series
 
Ser(ellan(E,20),q)*q
 
magma: ModularForm(E);
 

For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.

Modular degree: 8448
comment: Modular degree
 
sage: E.modular_degree()
 
gp: ellmoddegree(E)
 
magma: ModularDegree(E);
 
$ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: yes
Manin constant: 1
comment: Manin constant
 
magma: ManinConstant(E);
 

Local data

This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 3 primes of bad reduction:

prime Tamagawa number Kodaira symbol Reduction type Root number ord($N$) ord($\Delta$) ord$(j)_{-}$
$3$ $2$ $I_{2}$ Split multiplicative -1 1 2 2
$5$ $1$ $I_{1}$ Split multiplicative -1 1 1 1
$23$ $4$ $I_{1}^{*}$ Additive -1 2 7 1

comment: Local data
 
sage: E.local_data()
 
gp: ellglobalred(E)[5]
 
magma: [LocalInformation(E,p) : p in BadPrimes(E)];
 
oscar: [(p,tamagawa_number(E,p), kodaira_symbol(E,p), reduction_type(E,p)) for p in bad_primes(E)]
 

Galois representations

The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$.

comment: mod p Galois image
 
sage: rho = E.galois_representation(); [rho.image_type(p) for p in rho.non_surjective()]
 
magma: [GaloisRepresentation(E,p): p in PrimesUpTo(20)];
 

gens = [[1, 2, 0, 1], [229, 2, 228, 3], [51, 2, 51, 3], [1, 0, 2, 1], [1, 1, 229, 0], [47, 2, 47, 3]]
 
GL(2,Integers(230)).subgroup(gens)
 
Gens := [[1, 2, 0, 1], [229, 2, 228, 3], [51, 2, 51, 3], [1, 0, 2, 1], [1, 1, 229, 0], [47, 2, 47, 3]];
 
sub<GL(2,Integers(230))|Gens>;
 

The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 230 = 2 \cdot 5 \cdot 23 \), index $2$, genus $0$, and generators

$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 229 & 2 \\ 228 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 51 & 2 \\ 51 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 1 \\ 229 & 0 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 47 & 2 \\ 47 & 3 \end{array}\right)$.

The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[230])$ is a degree-$384721920$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/230\Z)$.

Isogenies

gp: ellisomat(E)
 

This curve has no rational isogenies. Its isogeny class 7935.i consists of this curve only.

Twists

The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 345.d1, its twist by $-23$.

Growth of torsion in number fields

The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ (which is trivial) are as follows:

$[K:\Q]$ $K$ $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ Base change curve
$3$ 3.1.460.1 \(\Z/2\Z\) Not in database
$6$ 6.0.24334000.1 \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z\) Not in database
$8$ deg 8 \(\Z/3\Z\) Not in database
$12$ deg 12 \(\Z/4\Z\) Not in database

We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.

Iwasawa invariants

$p$ 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47
Reduction type ss split split ord ord ss ord ord add ord ord ord ord ord ord
$\lambda$-invariant(s) 3,4 1 1 0 0 0,0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
$\mu$-invariant(s) 0,0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0

An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.

$p$-adic regulators

All $p$-adic regulators are identically $1$ since the rank is $0$.