Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
\(y^2+xy=x^3+x^2-10685409x-13672229067\) | (homogenize, simplify) |
\(y^2z+xyz=x^3+x^2z-10685409xz^2-13672229067z^3\) | (dehomogenize, simplify) |
\(y^2=x^3-13848290739x-637683794992242\) | (homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
\(\Z\)
Infinite order Mordell-Weil generator and height
$P$ | = | \(\left(\frac{65656689}{9409}, \frac{454620918066}{912673}\right)\) |
$\hat{h}(P)$ | ≈ | $9.6313256620021655722089282198$ |
Integral points
None
Invariants
Conductor: | \( 77658 \) | = | $2 \cdot 3 \cdot 7 \cdot 43^{2}$ | comment: Conductor
sage: E.conductor().factor()
gp: ellglobalred(E)[1]
magma: Conductor(E);
oscar: conductor(E)
|
Discriminant: | $-2618649075672714333312 $ | = | $-1 \cdot 2^{7} \cdot 3^{6} \cdot 7^{4} \cdot 43^{8} $ | comment: Discriminant
sage: E.discriminant().factor()
gp: E.disc
magma: Discriminant(E);
oscar: discriminant(E)
|
j-invariant: | \( -\frac{11543820929593}{224042112} \) | = | $-1 \cdot 2^{-7} \cdot 3^{-6} \cdot 7^{-4} \cdot 43 \cdot 6451^{3}$ | comment: j-invariant
sage: E.j_invariant().factor()
gp: E.j
magma: jInvariant(E);
oscar: j_invariant(E)
|
Endomorphism ring: | $\Z$ | |||
Geometric endomorphism ring: | \(\Z\) | (no potential complex multiplication) | sage: E.has_cm()
magma: HasComplexMultiplication(E);
| |
Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
Faltings height: | $2.9033781114827365768400188043\dots$ | gp: ellheight(E)
magma: FaltingsHeight(E);
oscar: faltings_height(E)
|
||
Stable Faltings height: | $0.39591136768702829452479046207\dots$ | magma: StableFaltingsHeight(E);
oscar: stable_faltings_height(E)
|
BSD invariants
Analytic rank: | $1$ | sage: E.analytic_rank()
gp: ellanalyticrank(E)
magma: AnalyticRank(E);
|
Regulator: | $9.6313256620021655722089282198\dots$ | comment: Regulator
sage: E.regulator()
G = E.gen \\ if available
magma: Regulator(E);
|
Real period: | $0.041703464994303077826555232575\dots$ | comment: Real Period
sage: E.period_lattice().omega()
gp: if(E.disc>0,2,1)*E.omega[1]
magma: (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1) * RealPeriod(E);
|
Tamagawa product: | $ 12 $ = $ 1\cdot2\cdot2\cdot3 $ | comment: Tamagawa numbers
sage: E.tamagawa_numbers()
gp: gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
magma: TamagawaNumbers(E);
oscar: tamagawa_numbers(E)
|
Torsion order: | $1$ | comment: Torsion order
sage: E.torsion_order()
gp: elltors(E)[1]
magma: Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
oscar: prod(torsion_structure(E)[1])
|
Analytic order of Ш: | $1$ ( rounded) | comment: Order of Sha
sage: E.sha().an_numerical()
magma: MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
|
Special value: | $ L'(E,1) $ ≈ $ 4.8199158311284827496955072419 $ | comment: Special L-value
r = E.rank();
gp: [r,L1r] = ellanalyticrank(E); L1r/r!
magma: Lr1 where r,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision:=12);
|
BSD formula
$\displaystyle 4.819915831 \approx L'(E,1) = \frac{\# Ш(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.041703 \cdot 9.631326 \cdot 12}{1^2} \approx 4.819915831$
Modular invariants
Modular form 77658.2.a.i
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
Modular degree: | 4854528 | comment: Modular degree
sage: E.modular_degree()
gp: ellmoddegree(E)
magma: ModularDegree(E);
|
$ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | yes | |
Manin constant: | 1 | comment: Manin constant
magma: ManinConstant(E);
|
Local data
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 4 primes of bad reduction:
prime | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | ord($N$) | ord($\Delta$) | ord$(j)_{-}$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$2$ | $1$ | $I_{7}$ | Non-split multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
$3$ | $2$ | $I_{6}$ | Non-split multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
$7$ | $2$ | $I_{4}$ | Non-split multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
$43$ | $3$ | $IV^{*}$ | Additive | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image |
---|---|---|
$2$ | 2G | 8.2.0.1 |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has label 8.2.0.a.1, level \( 8 = 2^{3} \), index $2$, genus $0$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 5 & 2 \\ 5 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 7 & 2 \\ 6 & 3 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 1 \\ 7 & 0 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 7 & 2 \\ 7 & 3 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[8])$ is a degree-$768$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/8\Z)$.
Isogenies
This curve has no rational isogenies. Its isogeny class 77658.i consists of this curve only.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 77658.bf1, its twist by $-43$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ (which is trivial) are as follows:
$[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
---|---|---|---|
$3$ | 3.1.14792.1 | \(\Z/2\Z\) | Not in database |
$6$ | 6.0.1750426112.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z\) | Not in database |
$8$ | 8.2.287233273705392.3 | \(\Z/3\Z\) | Not in database |
$12$ | deg 12 | \(\Z/4\Z\) | Not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
$p$ | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 43 | 47 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction type | nonsplit | nonsplit | ord | nonsplit | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord | ss | ord | add | ord |
$\lambda$-invariant(s) | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1,1 | 1 | - | 1 |
$\mu$-invariant(s) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0 | 0 | - | 0 |
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
Note: $p$-adic regulator data only exists for primes $p\ge 5$ of good ordinary reduction.